Skip to main content

Open-book Exams: Do they hurt or help?

I do a lot of experimenting in my 2000-level educational psychology course because I teach it every semester and it is a medium-sized course.

Here are some examples:
  • I’ve compared using writing assignments vs. lecture only for covering behaviorism (not my favorite learning theory). No surprise here... Writing about the relevancy of behaviorism helps students understand the concepts. 
  • Using case studies with and without quizzes compared to lecture only. This was interesting because case studies did not help students better understand the concepts in educational psychology, even with the added extrinsic motivator of a quiz. 
  • Various ways to conduct in-class exam reviews, including collaborative study guides, crossword making, Kahoot games made by me, Kahoot games made by students, no review, Q & A style review session. I am still collecting data on this so I am not sure yet which review is most effective. I want to try all the varieties of each unit so if will take me several semesters. 
  • Self-selected field experience, observation only, or set structured field experience: This data collection is still in progress with this semester being the first one in which students are assigned a field experience  that I actually am involved in. More information about this here and here. 
  • Flipped classroom style video assignments: I just started this to increase in-class time for activities, but still feel like I don't have enough time!
However, this week I am wondering about assessment style. For many semesters I have done online exams that were not proctored. This made them open book automatically. This semester I switched to in-class closed book exams and students have struggled. The average has been in the 60s for the past 2 exams. Because I was away at a conference and my students didn’t have much of any in-class review, I decided to experiment and allow them to have an open book exam in class this week.
Image result for open book

What do you think of these type of testing practices? I know it depends on what the objective of the course is, but in the real world we look things up all the time... however, it is valuable to have information internalized so that we can apply it automatically...

Well... the averages reveal that although they did slightly better than the last two tests, there is no significant difference and they did better on their very first exam. So there is probably an interaction effect between time, content, etc.

Now I am not sure which option to give them for the last exam of the semester. Maybe I will show them the data and argue that their books and notes don't help. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Writing on the Wall: Arguing Against Spanking

It's the 5th week of school and by now we have covered behaviorism and operant conditioning in all three of the classes I teach. I teach that we reinforce productive, desirable behavior before punishing undesirable behavior, and that removal punishment (taking away a privilege or object) should be used before resorting to presentation punishment (scolding or a negative consequence). This is counterintuitive, especially because many of us were raised in environments in which corporal punishment was normative. Discussion is always freeform in my classes and comments are encouraged. I present concrete situations from real life, like my daughter drawing on the wall or a student not being able to stay seated during on-task time. Inevitably spanking comes up in these educational psychology discussions. "If you just pop them, then they will stop immediately... If I got hit, I never did the thing again... little kids are too young to understand other consequences..." As a mot
2 comments
Read more

On Fridays We Wear Red

Today is the last day of the first week of the spring semester at Valdosta State University . Every Friday we wear red to show school spirit. I went ahead and just bought red glasses to make things easier! This semester I *get to* teach two sections of an introductory educational psychology course, called Exploring Learning and Teaching, along with an online section of Educational Psychology for Teaching Adults. These are not new preps; in other words, I have taught these classes before and get to have fun with them. This first week is just an introduction so I chose to try out this empathetic syllabi review exercise from the blog, Faculty Focus . In my face-to-face sections, I asked students to bring in their syllabi and critically review them for missing information, as well as mark important dates in their calendars (paper or electronic). This then facilitated a discussion about why some instructors may leave out due dates or points for each assignment. This is my attempt t
2 comments
Read more

Gamification for ADHD: This week's experience with Forest

This week I learned about an app, called Forest , from an academic mom group and immediately had to try it. Here is a really good  review  all about the app by Amy French. I did spring for the $1.99 paid version that allows you to connect with friends... This is a perfect example of gamification applied to staying on task, which is a primary problem for those of us who struggle with ADHD. Elements of gamification that the app uses includes points (leaves) earned for minutes spent on task. This is measured by not being able to toggle to any other app on the phone. One of my friends already pointed out that a browser version would be more helpful for her and guess what?!? The developers of Forest have a free Chrome extension you can use. For every block of time spent on task/off your phone (25 minutes is the default setting), your forest grows a tree and you earn points . With points (leaves) you can buy ( unlock ) special privileges, background music/sounds, and different types o
Post a Comment
Read more